View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently September 1st, 2014, 9:44 am



Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
 Greg Jones 
Author Message
Post Greg Jones
A lot of Spartys thought that Jones would be a 2nd round pick. What does anyone think of where he fell to? I like his talent and I think he became a value in the 4th round. I know he's a different player than the guy we drafted in the 5th, but I'll be mad as hell if Jones pans out and our 5th round pick is a bust... Thoughts...


May 2nd, 2011, 8:31 pm
RIP Killer
User avatar

Joined: June 26th, 2006, 1:03 pm
Posts: 13429
Post Re: Greg Jones
I was suprised to see him fall. I usually we see guys who produce in big schools get drafted earlier because presumably they have proven themselves against better talent. This year it seemed a lot of seemingly good talent fell inthe draft and out of the draft completely for potential players from "no name" schools. I wonder if the NFL is opening up to ponential more, or I'm just smoking crack and this year seems like it happened more than usual.

_________________
regularjoe12 - "You are crackin me up! really! HILARIOUS um let me quote some intellgent people in this coneversation: Steensn:"


May 2nd, 2011, 8:46 pm
Profile
RIP Killer
User avatar

Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm
Posts: 9850
Location: Where ever I'm at now
Post Re: Greg Jones
Jones seemed to free fall after the Combines, which tells me that teams saw things they didn't like. I know his forty time was surprisingly slow, and he looked rather mediocre during the position drills.

Based on his production at MSU, I would have thought of him as a solid third or fourth rounder. But the fact that so many other teams didn't see it that way leaves you wondering. Same thing goes for Quan Sturdivant. I saw him as a solid third rounder, maybe a late second. Time will tell...

_________________
Driver of the 'we need a coaching change' bandwagon. Climb aboard.


May 2nd, 2011, 10:14 pm
Profile
Post Re: Greg Jones
To date I'll give myself a (small) pat on the back for this one... I know it's not a big deal, but I'd much rather have Greg Jones thus far than Doug Hogue.


April 4th, 2012, 4:42 pm
Player of the Year - Defense

Joined: September 25th, 2007, 3:20 am
Posts: 2748
Post Re: Greg Jones
A pat on the back for what? I'm just curious where you think he did a good job.


April 4th, 2012, 8:46 pm
Profile
Team MVP
User avatar

Joined: February 20th, 2007, 10:51 pm
Posts: 3333
Location: Saginaw, MI
Post Re: Greg Jones
njroar wrote:
A pat on the back for what? I'm just curious where you think he did a good job.


Beats me too. He had what, 31 tackles.

_________________
April 22nd, 2010 @ 7:44p.m. "The Detroit Lions select...Ndamukong Suh". Those are some beautiful words.


Lionbacker2 Fantasy Champion 2011


April 4th, 2012, 9:00 pm
Profile
Player of the Year - Defense

Joined: September 25th, 2007, 3:20 am
Posts: 2748
Post Re: Greg Jones
kdsberman wrote:
njroar wrote:
A pat on the back for what? I'm just curious where you think he did a good job.


Beats me too. He had what, 31 tackles.


21


April 4th, 2012, 9:37 pm
Profile
RIP Killer
User avatar

Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm
Posts: 9850
Location: Where ever I'm at now
Post Re: Greg Jones
wjb21ndtown wrote:
To date I'll give myself a (small) pat on the back for this one... I know it's not a big deal, but I'd much rather have Greg Jones thus far than Doug Hogue.


What? Because Greg Jones saw the field just a bit more? Late round prospects are developmental. That means taking a player who has raw potential, rather than a complete resume. Jones was pretty much a known commodity, little room for continued growth. Hogue, on the other hand, is far more athletic than Jones and has only been playing linebacker for a couple years.

Personally, I would have preferred Hogue in the draft at that point. If we had taken Jones earlier to be our starting MLB, then I would be OK with that. But obviously the guys in Allen Park were not convinced of his being able to handle the job. It's way too early to call either guy a bust, but to be impressed by Jones lackluster performance in 2011 means you are setting the bar pretty damn low.

_________________
Driver of the 'we need a coaching change' bandwagon. Climb aboard.


April 4th, 2012, 11:16 pm
Profile
League MVP

Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm
Posts: 3572
Location: WSU
Post Re: Greg Jones
i think teams saw Jones as a 2 down middle linebacker and thats why he fell. the football instincts and the way he reads and diagnoses play is exceptional though. he was a good pick in rd 6. Hogue has good speed and size for a 5th rd pick we shall see how quickly he develops. with tulloch now in the fold jones doesnt really fit the system in place here so its hard to say, we missed by not taking him. if we did have him we d have to add another coverage linebacker for 3rd down bc they dont use durant much in pass situations on 3rd down either. at this point im happy they took hogue bc Levy is the LB I d like to see replaced and I dont think Jones fits what we would want on the outside


April 7th, 2012, 1:41 pm
Profile
Post Re: Greg Jones
m2karateman wrote:
wjb21ndtown wrote:
To date I'll give myself a (small) pat on the back for this one... I know it's not a big deal, but I'd much rather have Greg Jones thus far than Doug Hogue.


What? Because Greg Jones saw the field just a bit more? Late round prospects are developmental. That means taking a player who has raw potential, rather than a complete resume. Jones was pretty much a known commodity, little room for continued growth. Hogue, on the other hand, is far more athletic than Jones and has only been playing linebacker for a couple years.

Personally, I would have preferred Hogue in the draft at that point. If we had taken Jones earlier to be our starting MLB, then I would be OK with that. But obviously the guys in Allen Park were not convinced of his being able to handle the job. It's way too early to call either guy a bust, but to be impressed by Jones lackluster performance in 2011 means you are setting the bar pretty damn low.


IMO Jones saw the field more on a team with a better LB corps.

The Legend wrote:
i think teams saw Jones as a 2 down middle linebacker and thats why he fell. the football instincts and the way he reads and diagnoses play is exceptional though. he was a good pick in rd 6. Hogue has good speed and size for a 5th rd pick we shall see how quickly he develops. with tulloch now in the fold jones doesnt really fit the system in place here so its hard to say, we missed by not taking him. if we did have him we d have to add another coverage linebacker for 3rd down bc they dont use durant much in pass situations on 3rd down either. at this point im happy they took hogue bc Levy is the LB I d like to see replaced and I dont think Jones fits what we would want on the outside


This I do agree with, but I still think Jones is the more talented player. Time will tell, I guess.


April 8th, 2012, 1:05 pm
RIP Killer
User avatar

Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm
Posts: 9850
Location: Where ever I'm at now
Post Re: Greg Jones
Well, wjb, I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree again. How you can view the Giants as having a "better" linebacking corps than the Lions is beyond me. Michael Boley was their only good linebacker, Kiwanuka, if you consider him a linebacker, is OK, but he actually played more DE than LB last season. None of the others were that impressive, which is exactly why the Giants are seen as having a pretty big need at LB.

_________________
Driver of the 'we need a coaching change' bandwagon. Climb aboard.


April 8th, 2012, 7:28 pm
Profile
Player of the Year - Defense

Joined: September 25th, 2007, 3:20 am
Posts: 2748
Post Re: Greg Jones
Jones played 204 snaps, so he got his shot. Blackburn won over the spot because QB's had a 39 rating vs him. Against Jones, they had 149.3 QB rating. But M2k is right, the NYG LBs were a weak spot which is saying something considering their secondary.


April 8th, 2012, 11:54 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.