I'm gonna assume that steensn likes removing abestos and lead from homes, but he's perfectly fine with adding mercury. Doesn't anybody else see the hypocrisy?

If you refuse to understand the whole argument you can twist it anyway you want. I'm not against lead paint actually... I'm only against people eating it. Abestos is dangerous and unavoidable given long term exposure and having it present doesn't give you an issue here or there. Mercury is more like lead paint. If you break a bulb, it is a short problem that can be fixed. Long term there is no harm and it won't cause any side effects... in fact it reduced the amount of mercury that one is exposed to long term.

So if you want to make blind statements, then yet you can make up whatever you want. If you want to do some due dilligence in what you are saying, you'll think about it a little more sometime...

I suppose you're in favor of battery-powered cars that catch fire while recharging in the garage too, huh?

I'm in favor of working on getting them cheaper and meeting the customers needs and fix design problems.