View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently October 20th, 2014, 11:58 pm



Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 C.J. Spiller at #2 
Author Message
Millen Draft Pick - Epic Bust
User avatar

Joined: December 30th, 2005, 6:55 pm
Posts: 732
Location: Connecticut
Post C.J. Spiller at #2
After watching tape on C.J. Spiller, I have no problems if the Lions decided to take him #2 in the draft. This kid has top notch speed and tremendous acceleration. He is a true game changer and is a threat to score any time he touches the ball. He catches the ball very well out of the backfield and would have to be accounted for anytime he's on the field. He makes people miss and has an ability to break tackles as well.

He could line up in the backfield or in the slot as a receiver and create matchup nightmares for opposing defenses. Reggie Bush was drafted #2 overall and this kid is better than Bush IMO so if that's the way they end up going I'm ok with that.

_________________
Rebuilding since 1957.


April 6th, 2010, 10:59 am
Profile
Color Commentator - John Madden
User avatar

Joined: January 19th, 2007, 3:21 am
Posts: 1919
Location: A2
Post 
Reggie Bush has been a relative disappointment considering his draft position. Sure he's a great change of pace back and adds a lot on the PR, but in retrospect I don't think he was worth #2.

I think Spiller is of the same mold as Bush and wouldn't want to take him at #2. If they wanted to drop down to 9 or 10 then maybe I'd consider it, but not at #2.

_________________
Forward down the field!


April 6th, 2010, 11:10 am
Profile
Play by Play Announcer - Al Michaels
User avatar

Joined: October 15th, 2005, 12:45 pm
Posts: 1834
Post 
I would take Matthews before I would draft Spiller.

_________________
2011 Adopted Lion: Rob Sims/Looking for a side job at I.H.O.P because he can't stop making pancakes.


April 6th, 2010, 11:17 am
Profile
Heisman Winner
User avatar

Joined: March 28th, 2005, 7:50 pm
Posts: 805
Location: Burbs of De-town
Post 
No.










Code:
This is not a  fantasy football dynasty draft we are talking here.


April 6th, 2010, 12:06 pm
Profile
RIP Killer
User avatar

Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm
Posts: 9888
Location: Where ever I'm at now
Post 
Too many people see Spiller and imagine the next Chris Johnson. Well, for every Chris Johnson there's a dozen guys who become part time players, ala Bush, or simply aren't able to cut it in the NFL.

I think Spiller would best be utilized by a team looking for their speed guy in a platoon situation, who already have a big back in place.

I don't see him going earlier than the sixth pick, and even then if I were Seattle I'd be more inclined to get a tackle first.

With our offensive line, I don't think Spiller makes as big of a difference. He may be fast, but he's no Barry Sanders. And he certainly isn't a tackle breaker in the mold of Adrian Peterson.

Stick to the plan.....either trade down or take Ndamukong Suh. First impressions are usually the right ones.


April 6th, 2010, 1:04 pm
Profile
5th Round Pick - Traded

Joined: March 21st, 2005, 2:11 pm
Posts: 1052
Location: Wolverine, Mi.
Post 
Even though I like Spiller a lot, I would rather address our shortcomings at the line of scrimmage with a lineman (preferably defense) then take a RB at 34 or 66.


April 6th, 2010, 1:08 pm
Profile
Heisman Winner
User avatar

Joined: March 28th, 2005, 7:50 pm
Posts: 805
Location: Burbs of De-town
Post 
liontrax wrote:
Even though I like Spiller a lot, I would rather address our shortcomings at the line of scrimmage with a lineman (preferably defense) then take a RB at 34 or 66.


Taking Spiller that high would be very Millenesque. You are trying to put drywall and windows up when you haven't even built the foundation.


April 6th, 2010, 1:12 pm
Profile
5th Round Pick - Traded

Joined: March 21st, 2005, 2:11 pm
Posts: 1052
Location: Wolverine, Mi.
Post 
yostevo wrote:
liontrax wrote:
Even though I like Spiller a lot, I would rather address our shortcomings at the line of scrimmage with a lineman (preferably defense) then take a RB at 34 or 66.


Taking Spiller that high would be very Millenesque. You are trying to put drywall and windows up when you haven't even built the foundation.


Agreed, that's why I think they should wait on a Rb til 2 or 3. They could even take Best (if he's still there) at 34, and get basically the same kind of back that Spiller is.


April 6th, 2010, 1:34 pm
Profile
Millen Draft Pick - Epic Bust
User avatar

Joined: December 30th, 2005, 6:55 pm
Posts: 732
Location: Connecticut
Post 
I don't want Spiller at #2, but I'm ok with it if they feel he is the player that can have the biggest impact to win right away given the talent already present on offense. I don't think it will happen unless they trade down out of the top ten which is going to be near impossible to do unless some team wants Suh or Mccoy real bad and is willing to pay a price that would include next years #1 or #2 and a pick(s) in this years draft.

_________________
Rebuilding since 1957.


April 6th, 2010, 1:45 pm
Profile
Team MVP
User avatar

Joined: February 20th, 2007, 10:51 pm
Posts: 3362
Location: Saginaw, MI
Post 
I like the idea, and it would be awesome to have Spiller on our team, but I think we need to address that line on both sides of the ball first. In my opinion the first 2 rounds.

_________________
April 22nd, 2010 @ 7:44p.m. "The Detroit Lions select...Ndamukong Suh". Those are some beautiful words.


Lionbacker2 Fantasy Champion 2011


April 6th, 2010, 1:57 pm
Profile
Heisman Winner
User avatar

Joined: March 28th, 2005, 7:50 pm
Posts: 805
Location: Burbs of De-town
Post 
liontrax wrote:
yostevo wrote:
liontrax wrote:
Even though I like Spiller a lot, I would rather address our shortcomings at the line of scrimmage with a lineman (preferably defense) then take a RB at 34 or 66.


Taking Spiller that high would be very Millenesque. You are trying to put drywall and windows up when you haven't even built the foundation.


Agreed, that's why I think they should wait on a Rb til 2 or 3. They could even take Best (if he's still there) at 34, and get basically the same kind of back that Spiller is.


I think Best is every bit of a prospect considering I think neither is a complete back. So, I'd completely agree with the pick at 34.


April 6th, 2010, 2:13 pm
Profile
Walk On

Joined: May 20th, 2009, 5:40 pm
Posts: 444
Post 
They are going to draft a Running Back early. But early is probably the third round if someone real good isn't staring them in the face at 34 (or 33 if they decide they want to move up to make sure they get whomever).

It will not be any pick for the lions between #2 and #16 or so.


April 6th, 2010, 3:20 pm
Profile
Commissioner of the NFL – Roger Goodell
User avatar

Joined: August 7th, 2004, 4:47 am
Posts: 10943
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Post 
I hate to say it, but I wouldn't put it past them. Mayhew has consistently said that he plans to address the RB position this offseason through free agency or the draft. Since he hasn't signed one in FA yet, I have to assume that he plans to draft one. The coaching staff has also made comments about wanting a home run hitter at RB. This tells me that they're interested in guys like Spiller, Best, or McCluster. While I don't think it's likely that they would select Spiller at #2, I wouldn't completely rule it out either.

_________________
Image


April 6th, 2010, 4:47 pm
Profile
Online
QB Coach

Joined: January 13th, 2006, 4:18 am
Posts: 3215
Location: Maryland
Post 
Please no. I'd be less against him if we were in the bottom part of the top 10 but at #2? No thanks.


April 6th, 2010, 5:28 pm
Profile
Team MVP
User avatar

Joined: February 20th, 2007, 10:51 pm
Posts: 3362
Location: Saginaw, MI
Post 
If we happen to trade down i can definetly see it happening.

_________________
April 22nd, 2010 @ 7:44p.m. "The Detroit Lions select...Ndamukong Suh". Those are some beautiful words.


Lionbacker2 Fantasy Champion 2011


April 6th, 2010, 5:41 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.