Joined: August 6th, 2004, 9:21 am Posts: 8783 Location: Dallas
Re: Lions Predictions
MLive wrote:
Detroit Lions third best team in NFC North, not a playoff team, three NFL.com writers say
The Detroit Lions will spend their season looking up at the Green Bay Packers and the Chicago Bears, according to three-fourths of the writers previewing the team for NFL.com.
Bucky Brooks, Daniel Jeremiah, Adam Schein and Steve Wyche all gave their Lions predictions Monday. None of them have Detroit winning 10 games, and only one has them returning to the playoffs.
Brooks (8-8, third in NFC North): "After making the postseason for the first time in more than a decade, the Lions must deal with pressure and expectations that come along with being a favorite. Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson are ready for the challenge, but a suspect secondary could keep the defense from rising to the occasion."
Jeremiah (9-7, tied for second): "Can they take that next step? The Lions broke through the playoff barrier last season but they were out-classed by the Saints once they got there. Their division is brutally tough, but I still like their chances to return to the postseason."
Schein (8-8, third): "I love the passing attack, but I am very concerned about the run game, the offensive line, and the back end of the defense."
Wyche (9-7, third): "Suspect running game and holes in the secondary will put a dent in the spectacular passing attack, featuring Matt Stafford and Megatron."
All four writers have the Packers winning the division, three of them at 12-4.
And only Jeremiah has the Bears winning fewer than 10 games, tying the Lions for second in the division at 9-7. Brooks even has Chicago at 11-5.
NFL.com also highlighted three key games the Lions' season as well: Week 11 vs. Green Bay, Week 16 vs. Atlanta and Week 17 vs. Chicago.
Detroit Lions third best team in NFC North, not a playoff team, three NFL.com writers say
The Detroit Lions will spend their season looking up at the Green Bay Packers and the Chicago Bears, according to three-fourths of the writers previewing the team for NFL.com.
Bucky Brooks, Daniel Jeremiah, Adam Schein and Steve Wyche all gave their Lions predictions Monday. None of them have Detroit winning 10 games, and only one has them returning to the playoffs.
Brooks (8-8, third in NFC North): "After making the postseason for the first time in more than a decade, the Lions must deal with pressure and expectations that come along with being a favorite. Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson are ready for the challenge, but a suspect secondary could keep the defense from rising to the occasion."
Jeremiah (9-7, tied for second): "Can they take that next step? The Lions broke through the playoff barrier last season but they were out-classed by the Saints once they got there. Their division is brutally tough, but I still like their chances to return to the postseason."
Schein (8-8, third): "I love the passing attack, but I am very concerned about the run game, the offensive line, and the back end of the defense."
Wyche (9-7, third): "Suspect running game and holes in the secondary will put a dent in the spectacular passing attack, featuring Matt Stafford and Megatron."
All four writers have the Packers winning the division, three of them at 12-4.
And only Jeremiah has the Bears winning fewer than 10 games, tying the Lions for second in the division at 9-7. Brooks even has Chicago at 11-5.
NFL.com also highlighted three key games the Lions' season as well: Week 11 vs. Green Bay, Week 16 vs. Atlanta and Week 17 vs. Chicago.
I agree with them completely, which is why I thought we needed to get two STARTERS out of our first and second round picks, rather than two DEPTH players. I'm pissed at our off-season. We could have had a solid team and made a real run. Bush, Porter and a good first round pick would have really solidified this team.
_________________ Fix The Offensive Line Fan Club Member #1
August 28th, 2012, 1:55 pm
thelomasbrowns
Color Commentator - John Madden
Joined: August 24th, 2010, 9:54 pm Posts: 1878
Re: Lions Predictions
wjb21ndtown wrote:
I agree with them completely, which is why I thought we needed to get two STARTERS out of our first and second round picks, rather than two DEPTH players. I'm pissed at our off-season. We could have had a solid team and made a real run. Bush, Porter and a good first round pick would have really solidified this team.
Like DeCastro?
_________________ "Who we are on the field are the bad guys. ... We're the ones that nobody wants to see succeed, and we like it that way. We play better that way." -Nate Burleson
I agree with them completely, which is why I thought we needed to get two STARTERS out of our first and second round picks, rather than two DEPTH players. I'm pissed at our off-season. We could have had a solid team and made a real run. Bush, Porter and a good first round pick would have really solidified this team.
Like DeCastro?
Absolutely... Be a Monday morning Qb if you think it's wise or fair, show me someone that was afraid of him for injury reason prior to the draft.
And, he struggled in Pitt against good competition on their OL and DL, and their 3-4 D confused him, but I think he would have out played Peterman from day 1.
_________________ Fix The Offensive Line Fan Club Member #1
August 28th, 2012, 5:34 pm
conversion02
RIP Killer
Joined: January 26th, 2005, 9:34 pm Posts: 10069 Location: Sycamore, IL
Re: Lions Predictions
Wow...pot, meet kettle
_________________ ______
August 28th, 2012, 9:48 pm
thelomasbrowns
Color Commentator - John Madden
Joined: August 24th, 2010, 9:54 pm Posts: 1878
Re: Lions Predictions
wjb21ndtown wrote:
Absolutely... Be a Monday morning Qb if you think it's wise or fair,
_________________ "Who we are on the field are the bad guys. ... We're the ones that nobody wants to see succeed, and we like it that way. We play better that way." -Nate Burleson
August 28th, 2012, 11:20 pm
m2karateman
RIP Killer
Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm Posts: 9246 Location: Where ever I'm at now
Re: Lions Predictions
wjb21ndtown wrote:
thelomasbrowns wrote:
wjb21ndtown wrote:
I agree with them completely, which is why I thought we needed to get two STARTERS out of our first and second round picks, rather than two DEPTH players. I'm pissed at our off-season. We could have had a solid team and made a real run. Bush, Porter and a good first round pick would have really solidified this team.
Like DeCastro?
Absolutely... Be a Monday morning Qb if you think it's wise or fair, show me someone that was afraid of him for injury reason prior to the draft.
And, he struggled in Pitt against good competition on their OL and DL, and their 3-4 D confused him, but I think he would have out played Peterman from day 1.
You have to ask yourself this question....would DeCastro have been an upgrade over Peterman? The answer is yes. I realize he got injured in PITTSBURGH, that doesn't mean he would have gotten injured here.
Also, he was scheduled to be the starter on the offensive line for the Steelers. Only the fourth rookie offensive lineman to be an opening day starter in the history of that storied franchise.
I'd say that's a pretty strong statement as to just how good he is.
I wanted the Lions to get an offensive tackle as well, because we all know that Backus needs to be replaced. But Backus isn't the weak link on that line this year. That goes to either Peterman or Raiola. Peterman wasn't impressive in pre-season games, at all. His pass blocking is inconsistent, and his run blocking is non-existant.
_________________ I am losing interest in this team.....and that's saying something.
August 29th, 2012, 8:46 am
The Legend
Player of the Year - Offense
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm Posts: 2983 Location: WSU
Re: Lions Predictions
reiff>decastro, lions made the right pick at a position that would have otherwise been a big need soon
August 29th, 2012, 10:05 am
m2karateman
RIP Killer
Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm Posts: 9246 Location: Where ever I'm at now
Re: Lions Predictions
The Legend wrote:
reiff>decastro, lions made the right pick at a position that would have otherwise been a big need soon
Guard and center aren't going to be big needs soon? DeCastro can play either.
The difference is, who would have started sooner. DeCastro would have won the job over Peterman, no doubt in my mind.
However, it's useless to argue about it at this point. Reiff likely won't see the field this season unless there's an injury, and DeCastro won't play because of his injury. It's a moot point.
_________________ I am losing interest in this team.....and that's saying something.
August 29th, 2012, 10:11 am
TheRealWags
Modmin Dude
Joined: December 31st, 2004, 9:55 am Posts: 11276
Re: Lions Predictions
m2karateman wrote:
The Legend wrote:
reiff>decastro, lions made the right pick at a position that would have otherwise been a big need soon
Guard and center aren't going to be big needs soon? DeCastro can play either.
The difference is, who would have started sooner. DeCastro would have won the job over Peterman, no doubt in my mind.
However, it's useless to argue about it at this point. Reiff likely won't see the field this season unless there's an injury, and DeCastro won't play because of his injury. It's a moot point.
I have a feeling he'll be starting by the bye, then again it could just be indigestion...
_________________
Aristotle wrote:
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Socrates wrote:
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.
August 29th, 2012, 10:21 am
m2karateman
RIP Killer
Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm Posts: 9246 Location: Where ever I'm at now
Re: Lions Predictions
TheRealWags wrote:
m2karateman wrote:
The Legend wrote:
reiff>decastro, lions made the right pick at a position that would have otherwise been a big need soon
Guard and center aren't going to be big needs soon? DeCastro can play either.
The difference is, who would have started sooner. DeCastro would have won the job over Peterman, no doubt in my mind.
However, it's useless to argue about it at this point. Reiff likely won't see the field this season unless there's an injury, and DeCastro won't play because of his injury. It's a moot point.
I have a feeling he'll be starting by the bye, then again it could just be indigestion...
That's week six. And starting where? RT or LT?
_________________ I am losing interest in this team.....and that's saying something.
August 29th, 2012, 10:46 am
mwill2
Play by Play Announcer - Al Michaels
Joined: October 15th, 2005, 9:00 am Posts: 1839 Location: Greensboro, NC
Re: Lions Predictions
I agree that it's a little too early to say Reiff won't see the field this year. I wouldn't target the bye week as a specific target date but a lot can happen between now and January. And it's waaaaaay too early to talk about whether Reiff or DeCastro was the better pick. Let's have that talk in a few years.
_________________ Proud member of the Contract Extension for Schwartz Fan Club.
August 29th, 2012, 10:49 am
TheRealWags
Modmin Dude
Joined: December 31st, 2004, 9:55 am Posts: 11276
Re: Lions Predictions
m2karateman wrote:
TheRealWags wrote:
m2karateman wrote:
The Legend wrote:
reiff>decastro, lions made the right pick at a position that would have otherwise been a big need soon
Guard and center aren't going to be big needs soon? DeCastro can play either.
The difference is, who would have started sooner. DeCastro would have won the job over Peterman, no doubt in my mind.
However, it's useless to argue about it at this point. Reiff likely won't see the field this season unless there's an injury, and DeCastro won't play because of his injury. It's a moot point.
I have a feeling he'll be starting by the bye, then again it could just be indigestion...
That's week six. And starting where? RT or LT?
Why does it have to be tackle? He could possibly start at LG or RG as well
_________________
Aristotle wrote:
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Socrates wrote:
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.
August 29th, 2012, 11:58 am
m2karateman
RIP Killer
Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm Posts: 9246 Location: Where ever I'm at now
Re: Lions Predictions
TheRealWags wrote:
m2karateman wrote:
TheRealWags wrote:
m2karateman wrote:
The Legend wrote:
reiff>decastro, lions made the right pick at a position that would have otherwise been a big need soon
Guard and center aren't going to be big needs soon? DeCastro can play either.
The difference is, who would have started sooner. DeCastro would have won the job over Peterman, no doubt in my mind.
However, it's useless to argue about it at this point. Reiff likely won't see the field this season unless there's an injury, and DeCastro won't play because of his injury. It's a moot point.
I have a feeling he'll be starting by the bye, then again it could just be indigestion...
That's week six. And starting where? RT or LT?
Why does it have to be tackle? He could possibly start at LG or RG as well
OK, where ever. Do you honestly think Reiff is going to replace someone? Or are you predicting an injury?
_________________ I am losing interest in this team.....and that's saying something.
August 29th, 2012, 9:22 pm
The Legend
Player of the Year - Offense
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm Posts: 2983 Location: WSU
Re: Lions Predictions
m2karateman wrote:
The Legend wrote:
reiff>decastro, lions made the right pick at a position that would have otherwise been a big need soon
Guard and center aren't going to be big needs soon? DeCastro can play either.
The difference is, who would have started sooner. DeCastro would have won the job over Peterman, no doubt in my mind.
However, it's useless to argue about it at this point. Reiff likely won't see the field this season unless there's an injury, and DeCastro won't play because of his injury. It's a moot point.
the difference is that backus is older than peterman and its harder and generally much more expensive to find a left tackle than a guard or center.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum