Billy, I don't know where you get your info from, but you better find another source.

Rams LT is Roger Saffold. Not a rookie. However, they do have a starting guard that is a rookie. And Janoris Jenkins is listed as a starter in their secondary. All others are not rookies.

While the Rams may be an improved team, they still don't have the firepower to keep up with the Lions. They have a shaky offensive line, their secondary is definitely sub par, and their receivers are nothing to write home about. Steven Jackson and Isaiah Pead may give the Lions defense some fits, but I can't see it being enough against a healthy Stafford to Johnson/Young/Burleson/Pettigrew/Scheffler. Our defensive line will be the thing of nightmares for Bradford. Our only real question mark will be the health of our secondary.

Stafford throws forover 400 yards and four TDs. Our defense gives up 130 yards rushing, but just over 200 yards in the air.

Lions 34
Rams 14

So, I was off by 1 spot to the right? That is just 1 spot closer to the QB. Nit pick much?

So, I was off by 1 spot to the right? That is just 1 spot closer to the QB. Nit pick much?

Did you not also say that their entire secondary was rookies? You were way off on that one.

Got Alzheimer's much?

Kevin Smith goes over 100 by halftime

Did you not also say that their entire secondary was rookies? You were way off on that one.

Got Alzheimer's much?

The thing I've always liked about him college/pro is that he doesn't lose tons of yards alot, he usually can sliver and fight his way back to the LOS.

No. I did not say their entire secondary was rookies. You are putting words in my mouth. I said they have 5 rookie DB's. There is a difference. Try, actually, reading what I write next time.

OK, so how is their having 5 rookie DBs going to be a big advantage? The only starting rookie DB is Janoris Jenkins, who probably would have started for us and about 12 other teams had he been taken by any of them?

Having rookies start doesn't necessarily constitute a bad thing for the team starting them. Rokevious Watkins, the rookie guard, is pretty good and an upgrade over what they had. Michael Brockers, if he was going to play, is definitely a pretty good player and better than whoever is replacing him, and Janoris Jenkins may turn out to be better than any corner we have on our roster right now, including Chris Houston. St. Louis improved over last season personnel wise, have a much better head coach and won't be the cake walk many envision them to be.

OK, so how is their having 5 rookie DBs going to be a big advantage? The only starting rookie DB is Janoris Jenkins, who probably would have started for us and about 12 other teams had he been taken by any of them?

Having rookies start doesn't necessarily constitute a bad thing for the team starting them. Rokevious Watkins, the rookie guard, is pretty good and an upgrade over what they had. Michael Brockers, if he was going to play, is definitely a pretty good player and better than whoever is replacing him, and Janoris Jenkins may turn out to be better than any corner we have on our roster right now, including Chris Houston. St. Louis improved over last season personnel wise, have a much better head coach and won't be the cake walk many envision them to be.