|
|
Author |
Message |
aManNamedSuh
National Champion
Joined: July 14th, 2005, 11:58 am Posts: 867
|
 Re: Bama or ND?
aManNamedSuh wrote: Bama's offense is not that good. ND D will do well against them which is why I think it will be a fairly low scoring game, you may only see one offensive TD by both teams. Still sticking with 17-10 Bama. Yikes, I had the wrong read on this game.
|
January 8th, 2013, 9:41 am |
|
 |
Touchdown Jesus
Team MVP
Joined: August 21st, 2005, 3:36 am Posts: 3312 Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
 Re: Bama or ND?
That hurt
_________________ "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams
“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” - Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
January 8th, 2013, 11:26 am |
|
 |
Pablo
RIP Killer
Joined: August 6th, 2004, 9:21 am Posts: 10026 Location: Dallas
|
 Re: Bama or ND?
Te'o certainly didn't help his draft status. I did think Dee Milliner looked solid at CB and solidified his draft stock. A couple of the OL from Alabama also looked good, but Joeckel really stood out during the A&M game (although I didn't think Damontre Moore was overly impressive in that game).
_________________
LB Tweet
|
January 8th, 2013, 12:54 pm |
|
 |
BillySims
Martha Firestone Ford
Joined: May 7th, 2005, 3:25 pm Posts: 9011 Location: Earth/Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy
|
 Re: Bama or ND?
Pablo wrote: Te'o certainly didn't help his draft status. I did think Dee Milliner looked solid at CB and solidified his draft stock. A couple of the OL from Alabama also looked good, but Joeckel really stood out during the A&M game (although I didn't think Damontre Moore was overly impressive in that game). And this view is what should carry the most weight at draft time. What they actually do on the field. Not what they do in shorts. Otherwise, Al Davis would have built the greatest team ever.
|
January 8th, 2013, 1:03 pm |
|
 |
wjb21ndtown
|
 Re: Bama or ND?
BillySims wrote: Pablo wrote: Te'o certainly didn't help his draft status. I did think Dee Milliner looked solid at CB and solidified his draft stock. A couple of the OL from Alabama also looked good, but Joeckel really stood out during the A&M game (although I didn't think Damontre Moore was overly impressive in that game). And this view is what should carry the most weight at draft time. What they actually do on the field. Not what they do in shorts. Otherwise, Al Davis would have built the greatest team ever. That's all well and good, but IMO Milliner looks slow even against NDs slow WRs. I don't know if it's his change of direction or straight line speed, but he seemed to need to "catch up" to the WR as they waited and adjusted for the ball. That won't fly in the NFL with more athletic WRs and more accurate Qbs. He seems like a nice, big athletic cover CB, but IMO he's not worthy of a top 5 or even top 10 pick. If we do draft him we better pick up Byrd to play safety, or a speedy FS and move Delmas to SS. That said, I'm hoping somehow that we can land Joeckel, but I doubt it.
|
January 8th, 2013, 2:11 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|