| Author |
Message |
|
rao
NFL Veteran
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 1332
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
 Available WRs for Lions
Here's 2 guys that would be incredibly helpful to the Lions. I'd give up a 2nd for Gordon or maybe go cheap and get Little for a 6th. CJ, Gordon, Broyles would be a top tier WR corp.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 11:47 am |
|
|
|
Shotty
Butkus Award Winner
Joined: July 3rd, 2012, 2:06 am
Posts: 649
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I wouldn't be comfortable with a 2nd for Gordon. 1 more f up and hes banned from the league. Little cant catch a cold but I also think a 6th is reasonable. A 3rd for Gordon would be good.
_________________
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 12:05 pm |
|
|
|
The Legend
League MVP
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm
Posts: 3530
Location: WSU
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions rao wrote:
Here's 2 guys that would be incredibly helpful to the Lions. I'd give up a 2nd for Gordon or maybe go cheap and get Little for a 6th. CJ, Gordon, Broyles would be a top tier WR corp. forget Little, the player to target is Gordon and he d fit in perfectly as a No 2. Red flags need to be checked out to avoid this being a Charles Rogers the fourth, Big Mike Williams the third, or a Titus Young the second situation but I would go for Gordon. Broyles or Edwards would transition naturally into a No 3 spot and Burleson's role could be scaled back as Gordon learns the offense and Broyles/Edwards regain health. I'd give a 3rd and a 5th for Gordon and a 7th but wouldnt give a No 2. Little, in my opinion is not worth acquiring unless all you are giving up is LeShoure and Durham or a conditional 7th round pick.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 12:13 pm |
|
|
|
rao
NFL Veteran
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 1332
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I forgot about Gordon's MJ problem, so I think you are all very right in not wanting to put out a 2nd.
I still think Little is good value if they want too much for Gordon. Little can't be anymore frustrating than what they have now and he has to be respected going deep. Little would at least be a 6th round pick that actually can see the field.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 12:50 pm |
|
|
|
The Legend
League MVP
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm
Posts: 3530
Location: WSU
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions rao wrote: I forgot about Gordon's MJ problem, so I think you are all very right in not wanting to put out a 2nd.
I still think Little is good value if they want too much for Gordon. Little can't be anymore frustrating than what they have now and he has to be respected going deep. Little would at least be a 6th round pick that actually can see the field. depends when his (Little) rookie deal is up, giving up a 6th just to have him for the rest of this season IMO is not worth it. i dont think he s (Little's) talented enough to make an impact without having been here in the training camp, OTAs, minicamps, etc. Maybe worth a 7th if they can keep him next year too but really I d rather bring back Matt Willis instead and cut Durham
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 1:03 pm |
|
|
|
kdsberman
Team MVP
Joined: February 20th, 2007, 10:51 pm
Posts: 3304
Location: Saginaw, MI
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions Id do Gordon for a 4th and LeShoure. The Browns are clearly trying to stockpile picks to build a future and I think you could get Gordon for that.
_________________
April 22nd, 2010 @ 7:44p.m. "The Detroit Lions select...Ndamukong Suh". Those are some beautiful words.
Lionbacker2 Fantasy Champion 2011
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 1:28 pm |
|
|
|
The Legend
League MVP
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm
Posts: 3530
Location: WSU
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions kdsberman wrote: Id do Gordon for a 4th and LeShoure. The Browns are clearly trying to stockpile picks to build a future and I think you could get Gordon for that. lol, nobody wants leshoure and gordon is a legit talent only 22 yo?, no way a 4th is enough. probably they will get a 2nd for him or a 3rd and another pick. if all they get is a 4 they should just keep him
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 1:48 pm |
|
|
|
rao
NFL Veteran
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 1332
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions There is no way Gordon goes for less than a 3rd and something else. His first game back from suspension and he went for 146 yard receiving, 1 TD, and added a 22 yard run too. The kid is Number 1 WR level talent, so they will probably get a 2nd from someone.
Everyone should probably just stop with the Leshoure stuff. The only chance the Lions had of trading him was probably the Colts since Irsay loves making deals, but even that was a far fetched proposition. Leshoure has no value.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 4:38 pm |
|
|
|
thelomasbrowns
Fired Head Coach (0-16 record)
Joined: August 24th, 2010, 9:54 pm
Posts: 2249
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions Gordon today's top receiver (and my flex player  ). His asking price just went way up.
_________________
Driver of the Jim Caldwell bandwagon. Climb aboard.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 4:59 pm |
|
|
|
kdsberman
Team MVP
Joined: February 20th, 2007, 10:51 pm
Posts: 3304
Location: Saginaw, MI
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions thelomasbrowns wrote: Gordon today's top receiver (and my flex player ). His asking price just went way up. yup!
_________________
April 22nd, 2010 @ 7:44p.m. "The Detroit Lions select...Ndamukong Suh". Those are some beautiful words.
Lionbacker2 Fantasy Champion 2011
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 8:11 pm |
|
|
|
m2karateman
RIP Killer
Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm
Posts: 9848
Location: Where ever I'm at now
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions rao wrote: There is no way Gordon goes for less than a 3rd and something else. His first game back from suspension and he went for 146 yard receiving, 1 TD, and added a 22 yard run too. The kid is Number 1 WR level talent, so they will probably get a 2nd from someone.
Everyone should probably just stop with the Leshoure stuff. The only chance the Lions had of trading him was probably the Colts since Irsay loves making deals, but even that was a far fetched proposition. Leshoure has no value. Based on his performance, Gordon may no longer be on the block. I wouldn't trade anything for Little. In my opinion, I'd rather the Lions brought back Matt Willis and sh!tcanned Durham, than to trade for Little.
_________________
Driver of the 'we need a coaching change' bandwagon. Climb aboard.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 9:01 am |
|
|
|
rao
NFL Veteran
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 1332
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions m2karateman wrote: rao wrote: There is no way Gordon goes for less than a 3rd and something else. His first game back from suspension and he went for 146 yard receiving, 1 TD, and added a 22 yard run too. The kid is Number 1 WR level talent, so they will probably get a 2nd from someone.
Everyone should probably just stop with the Leshoure stuff. The only chance the Lions had of trading him was probably the Colts since Irsay loves making deals, but even that was a far fetched proposition. Leshoure has no value. Based on his performance, Gordon may no longer be on the block. I wouldn't trade anything for Little. In my opinion, I'd rather the Lions brought back Matt Willis and sh!tcanned Durham, than to trade for Little. He's always going to be on the block since he's always one drug violation away from a huge suspension and his performance in that game isn't a surprise. The Browns know he's an elite player they just don't want to deal with his off the field issues.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 1:23 pm |
|
|
|
conversion02
RIP Killer
Joined: January 26th, 2005, 9:34 pm
Posts: 10286
Location: Sycamore, IL
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions That and they've already given up on the season
_________________
_____
I have no faith this team will win a game the rest of the year. The kitties finish at 7-9 and Miss the playoffs as GB wins out and takes it from the kitties.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 2:56 pm |
|
|
|
I.E.
Walk On
Joined: September 11th, 2010, 10:19 pm
Posts: 408
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I don't get it ... why do the Lions need WRs? Megatron, Burleson, Broyles ... plus Scheffler and Fauria and then also Bush and Bell... that's a potent attack.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 2:59 pm |
|
|
|
thelomasbrowns
Fired Head Coach (0-16 record)
Joined: August 24th, 2010, 9:54 pm
Posts: 2249
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I.E. wrote: I don't get it ... why do the Lions need WRs? Megatron, Burleson, Broyles ... plus Scheffler and Fauria and then also Bush and Bell... that's a potent attack. I think we think we need a big #2 (outside) receiver--like Alshon is for you guys. Our other WRs, while talented, all fit the slot receiver mold.
_________________
Driver of the Jim Caldwell bandwagon. Climb aboard.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 3:04 pm |
|
|
