| Author |
Message |
|
rao
Fired Head Coach (0-16 record)
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 2201
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
 Available WRs for Lions
Here's 2 guys that would be incredibly helpful to the Lions. I'd give up a 2nd for Gordon or maybe go cheap and get Little for a 6th. CJ, Gordon, Broyles would be a top tier WR corp.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 11:47 am |
|
|
|
LionsAllDay
National Champion
Joined: July 3rd, 2012, 2:06 am
Posts: 885
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I wouldn't be comfortable with a 2nd for Gordon. 1 more f up and hes banned from the league. Little cant catch a cold but I also think a 6th is reasonable. A 3rd for Gordon would be good.
_________________
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 12:05 pm |
|
|
|
The Legend
Team President
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm
Posts: 4868
Location: WSU
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions rao wrote:
Here's 2 guys that would be incredibly helpful to the Lions. I'd give up a 2nd for Gordon or maybe go cheap and get Little for a 6th. CJ, Gordon, Broyles would be a top tier WR corp. forget Little, the player to target is Gordon and he d fit in perfectly as a No 2. Red flags need to be checked out to avoid this being a Charles Rogers the fourth, Big Mike Williams the third, or a Titus Young the second situation but I would go for Gordon. Broyles or Edwards would transition naturally into a No 3 spot and Burleson's role could be scaled back as Gordon learns the offense and Broyles/Edwards regain health. I'd give a 3rd and a 5th for Gordon and a 7th but wouldnt give a No 2. Little, in my opinion is not worth acquiring unless all you are giving up is LeShoure and Durham or a conditional 7th round pick.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 12:13 pm |
|
|
|
rao
Fired Head Coach (0-16 record)
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 2201
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I forgot about Gordon's MJ problem, so I think you are all very right in not wanting to put out a 2nd.
I still think Little is good value if they want too much for Gordon. Little can't be anymore frustrating than what they have now and he has to be respected going deep. Little would at least be a 6th round pick that actually can see the field.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 12:50 pm |
|
|
|
The Legend
Team President
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm
Posts: 4868
Location: WSU
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions rao wrote: I forgot about Gordon's MJ problem, so I think you are all very right in not wanting to put out a 2nd.
I still think Little is good value if they want too much for Gordon. Little can't be anymore frustrating than what they have now and he has to be respected going deep. Little would at least be a 6th round pick that actually can see the field. depends when his (Little) rookie deal is up, giving up a 6th just to have him for the rest of this season IMO is not worth it. i dont think he s (Little's) talented enough to make an impact without having been here in the training camp, OTAs, minicamps, etc. Maybe worth a 7th if they can keep him next year too but really I d rather bring back Matt Willis instead and cut Durham
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 1:03 pm |
|
|
|
kdsberman
League MVP
Joined: February 20th, 2007, 10:51 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Saginaw, MI
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions Id do Gordon for a 4th and LeShoure. The Browns are clearly trying to stockpile picks to build a future and I think you could get Gordon for that.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 1:28 pm |
|
|
|
The Legend
Team President
Joined: February 11th, 2005, 3:01 pm
Posts: 4868
Location: WSU
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions kdsberman wrote: Id do Gordon for a 4th and LeShoure. The Browns are clearly trying to stockpile picks to build a future and I think you could get Gordon for that. lol, nobody wants leshoure and gordon is a legit talent only 22 yo?, no way a 4th is enough. probably they will get a 2nd for him or a 3rd and another pick. if all they get is a 4 they should just keep him
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 1:48 pm |
|
|
|
rao
Fired Head Coach (0-16 record)
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 2201
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions There is no way Gordon goes for less than a 3rd and something else. His first game back from suspension and he went for 146 yard receiving, 1 TD, and added a 22 yard run too. The kid is Number 1 WR level talent, so they will probably get a 2nd from someone.
Everyone should probably just stop with the Leshoure stuff. The only chance the Lions had of trading him was probably the Colts since Irsay loves making deals, but even that was a far fetched proposition. Leshoure has no value.
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 4:38 pm |
|
|
|
thelomasbrowns
Player of the Year - Offense
Joined: August 24th, 2010, 9:54 pm
Posts: 2855
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions Gordon today's top receiver (and my flex player  ). His asking price just went way up.
_________________
"Good teams don't worry about a whole lot of stuff. They travel, they play, they win. And it doesn't matter where they go, what the time block is, all those kinds of things. They never seem to bother teams that play well, and we want to be one of those teams." -Jim Caldwell
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 4:59 pm |
|
|
|
kdsberman
League MVP
Joined: February 20th, 2007, 10:51 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Saginaw, MI
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions thelomasbrowns wrote: Gordon today's top receiver (and my flex player ). His asking price just went way up. yup!
|
| September 22nd, 2013, 8:11 pm |
|
|
|
m2karateman
RIP Killer
Joined: October 20th, 2004, 4:16 pm
Posts: 10408
Location: Where ever I'm at now
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions rao wrote: There is no way Gordon goes for less than a 3rd and something else. His first game back from suspension and he went for 146 yard receiving, 1 TD, and added a 22 yard run too. The kid is Number 1 WR level talent, so they will probably get a 2nd from someone.
Everyone should probably just stop with the Leshoure stuff. The only chance the Lions had of trading him was probably the Colts since Irsay loves making deals, but even that was a far fetched proposition. Leshoure has no value. Based on his performance, Gordon may no longer be on the block. I wouldn't trade anything for Little. In my opinion, I'd rather the Lions brought back Matt Willis and sh!tcanned Durham, than to trade for Little.
_________________
I will not put on blinders when it comes to our QBs performances.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 9:01 am |
|
|
|
rao
Fired Head Coach (0-16 record)
Joined: November 28th, 2007, 12:50 pm
Posts: 2201
Location: Newport Beach, Ca
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions m2karateman wrote: rao wrote: There is no way Gordon goes for less than a 3rd and something else. His first game back from suspension and he went for 146 yard receiving, 1 TD, and added a 22 yard run too. The kid is Number 1 WR level talent, so they will probably get a 2nd from someone.
Everyone should probably just stop with the Leshoure stuff. The only chance the Lions had of trading him was probably the Colts since Irsay loves making deals, but even that was a far fetched proposition. Leshoure has no value. Based on his performance, Gordon may no longer be on the block. I wouldn't trade anything for Little. In my opinion, I'd rather the Lions brought back Matt Willis and sh!tcanned Durham, than to trade for Little. He's always going to be on the block since he's always one drug violation away from a huge suspension and his performance in that game isn't a surprise. The Browns know he's an elite player they just don't want to deal with his off the field issues.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 1:23 pm |
|
|
|
conversion02
RIP Killer
Joined: January 26th, 2005, 9:34 pm
Posts: 10863
Location: Sycamore, IL
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions That and they've already given up on the season
_________________
_____
Draft defense - CB, LB, DT, LB...WR/KR
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 2:56 pm |
|
|
|
I.E.
Walk On
Joined: September 11th, 2010, 10:19 pm
Posts: 408
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I don't get it ... why do the Lions need WRs? Megatron, Burleson, Broyles ... plus Scheffler and Fauria and then also Bush and Bell... that's a potent attack.
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 2:59 pm |
|
|
|
thelomasbrowns
Player of the Year - Offense
Joined: August 24th, 2010, 9:54 pm
Posts: 2855
|
Re: Available WRs for Lions I.E. wrote: I don't get it ... why do the Lions need WRs? Megatron, Burleson, Broyles ... plus Scheffler and Fauria and then also Bush and Bell... that's a potent attack. I think we think we need a big #2 (outside) receiver--like Alshon is for you guys. Our other WRs, while talented, all fit the slot receiver mold.
_________________
"Good teams don't worry about a whole lot of stuff. They travel, they play, they win. And it doesn't matter where they go, what the time block is, all those kinds of things. They never seem to bother teams that play well, and we want to be one of those teams." -Jim Caldwell
|
| September 23rd, 2013, 3:04 pm |
|
|
